There can only be few doubts that one’s awareness of the factors that contribute to the formation of the sense of cultural self-identity in people will come as an indispensable asset within the context of how he or she may go about striving to attain social/professional prominence. The validity of this suggestion is best illustrated with respect to the ongoing “multiculturalization” of American society as a whole (Hallman, 2017). The most distinctive identity-forming factors that I believe affect the representatives of the chosen populations have been outlined in the charts below.
African-Americans
Asians (China)
Middle-Easterners (Palestine)
Native-Americans
Europeans (Germany)
Given the listed particulars of my sense of cultural self-identity (as seen in the previous paper), I believe that I will be most likely to reach a mutual understanding with African-Americans and Native Americans. After all, there is indeed a good rationale to assume that the workings of these peoples’ psyches are somewhat similar to those of my own – not the least due to the ancestral memories of discrimination, shared by African-Americans, Native-Americans, and Hispanics (Guglani, 2016). The ontological soundness of such my belief is supported even further by the fact that, as one can infer from what has been said earlier, there are a number of reasons for the existential attitudes, on the part of all three peoples, to be compatible (Contreras, 2016).
At the same time, however, I am deeply convinced that it will not prove particularly challenging for me to be able to find the “communication key” to the representatives of the rest of the chosen populations, as well. The reason for this is apparent – while conducting the research I was able to increase the measure of my intercultural competence rather substantially. In particular, I learned that when it comes to indulging in intercultural communication, one may never cease paying close attention to the culturally/historically determined peculiarities of how people from different ethnic backgrounds tend to go about trying to realize their full existential potential.
References
Aharoni, S. (2014). The gender-culture double bind in Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations: A narrative approach. Security Dialogue, 45(4), 373-390.
Beamon, K. (2014). Racism and stereotyping on campus: Experiences of African American male student-athletes. The Journal of Negro Education, 83(2), 121-134.
Contreras, S. (2016). For economic advantage or something else? A case for racial identification switching. Review of Black Political Economy, 43(3-4), 301-323.
Guglani, L. (2016). American, Hispanic, Spanish-speaking? Hispanic immigrants and the question of identity. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 15(6), pp. 344-360.
Hallman, H. (2017). Millennial teachers and multiculturalism: Considerations for teaching in uncertain times. Journal for Multicultural Education, 11(3), 194-205.
Koehne, S. (2014). Were the National Socialists a folkish party? Paganism, Christianity, and the Nazi Christmas. Central European History, 47(4), 760-790.
Leavitt, P., Covarrubias, R., Perez, Y., & Fryberg, S. (2015). “Frozen in time”: The impact of Native American media representations on identity and self‐understanding. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 39-53.
McGee, E., Thakore, B., & LaBlance, S. (2017). The burden of being “model”: Racialized experiences of Asian STEM college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(3), 253-270.