The English Civil War, examined by Orr was a fight for sovereign power as a combination of positive powers. Among the primary reasons, there was the ability to create and implement laws, taxes, mistral’s position, coinage and ability to declare war with other states or make allies. The Protestant Church had an essential role in the events as well because religion played a crucial role in people’s lives at that time. I agree with Orr’s argument regarding the ideological causes of the English Civil War in the seventeenth sanctuary. The war in question had several issues with the concepts its participants applied to explain the necessity of actions. Orr stated that “the English Civil War was less an ideologically-driven ‘outbreak,’ a struggle for sovereign power in the state”. The author argues that the events were driven by a need to define sovereignty practically.
Orr criticizes the ideological grounds of the Stuart movement, stating that their argument was imperfect conceptually. Due to the fact that no particular idea was the center of the campaign, it can be argued that events were defining the ideological concepts and not vice versa. Lamont argues that there were distinct differences in the causes of the war and the reasons for which the people in it fought.It supports the idea of Orr because the statement shows that politicians could adjust their motives to suit the motivation of people. The finish and fundamentum are two primary forces, which guided the War and its participants. The first one ascribes personal motives while the second one examines the causes of events. Lamont argues that research of Baxter’s memoirs, who had participated in the circumstances, revealed that his motives were different from the general view of the English Civil War.
Primarily, the cause which guided the Puritans in their actions was the belief that their king was involved in the Irish Catholic rebellion. The general reason for the war would be a strive to gain sovereign power over the state. Orr argues that the evidence regarding personal rule emerged after the War’s outbreak. The distinction between these factors supports Orr’s arguments regarding the ideology of the English Civil War. Another argument that supports Orr’s opinion on the English Civil War is the involvement of religion. It was among the major forces behind the war because many people saw the application of it as a proper way to govern the country. The historian of that time, Hayward, wrote that those who want to manage the affairs of a state should also be concerned with religious events. Thus, it can be concluded that religion was involved in the War only because people in the country had a particular view of governance, which included religious input.