Among the three branches of power, the judiciary can have the most significant impact on individuals. For example, the legislative branch passes laws, but courts have an opportunity to interpret them differently. Furthermore, courts have the right to find governors’ actions or decisions unconstitutional. Even though many people tend to believe that courts are blind and unbiased, a few aspects prove the opposite. Thus, I agree that the judicial system in Texas is as political as the executive and legislative branches of the Texas government.
Three reasons prove that the Texas judicial branch is political. Firstly, it refers to the way judges are elected. According to Newell, Prindle, and Riddlesperger, Texas citizens often vote for an officer based on whether they are Democrats or Republicans. Thus, becoming a judge requires the right connections and beliefs, which is a feature of a political process. Secondly, a significant amount of discretion that is given to Texas judges provides them with freedom of action. As a result, judges of various political beliefs rule differently. Finally, Newell et al. argue that courts do not treat everyone equally. For example, they state that organizations perform better in comparison with individuals.
In conclusion, the information mentioned above supports the idea that the Texas judicial branch is political. It is proved by three reasons, including the judicial selection method, almost unlimited discretion of judges, and legal inequalities. This state of affairs has different impacts on American society. Consequently, average citizens do not get advantages from this fact, while wealthy people and organizations benefit significantly from the political nature of the judiciary branch because they can influence it. Thus, the fact that the Texas judicial branch is political is not good because it results in an unequal society.