People take multiple steps to understand the components of the universe, as well as nature and the role of its creator. According to Rowe, the design argument is based on the idea that many things exist in specific order, design, and condition. With time, this position can be reinforced due to the possibility to observe the same objects from another angle, discover new forms of existence, and find evidence of something that has not been clarified before. In other words, the more people live and improve their knowledge, the more new information and options become available. Thus, the existence of beauty as a part of the universe system may be interpreted in a variety of ways, including cosmological and ontological arguments.
Despite the intention to prove the theistic existence of God, not much evidence is available at the moment. The cosmological argument needs sufficient reasons to make sure that the existence of something is true. The ontological argument requires the presence of specific conclusions. The design argument supports the idea that many natural parts are rooted in intelligent design. Taking these approaches into consideration, it is wrong to expect that there is a unique supernatural artist that creates beauty out of nothing. At the same time, there should always be some space for people to believe that everything in this world is made by someone. The presence of several opposite arguments may confuse, but it is a decision of every individual in what to believe. Beauty is more than just an intelligent design but a combination of human non-intervention, supreme power, and resources available to a particular planet, as a part of the universe.