Shakespeare: Fading Away


Shakespeare’s literal works are characterized by intricate or hidden meanings, complex vocabulary, and elaborative imagery. The type of writing employed by Shakespeare presents enormous challenges to present-day English readers; it is very difficult for modern readers to extract and understand his works. The inherent difficulties are the reason why many modern readers do not appreciate Shakespearean mode or way of writing and thus do not utilize Shakespearean writings.

Secondly, the reason why people have not taken much to Shakespearean works or literary modes is the rapid development of technology. Individuals using modern technology have developed literary works that are more appealing than the otherwise Shakespearean classics. Additionally, the perception that Shakespeare’s works are too difficult in contrast with other literary works makes individuals ignore such works. Equally, producers of content for social networks like YouTube do not endeavor to develop content in the Shakespearean tradition. This implies that modern technology does not support literary works by the likes of Shakespeare.


Perception in learning anything is a factor that inspires or discourages the learning process. Societal perceptions are captured in works of literature; most literary works are contextual in terms of time and style of writing. The literal style used depends on the literal tastes of the recipients. Therefore, to appreciate a work of art, one has to immerse oneself in the context within which it was put together.

Students form their opinion of a work of art based on the general perception of society. Thus, when a student is made to believe the subject, he or she is intending to undertake is difficult then the interest tends to fade. Taking the Shakespearean course is perceived to be challenging; society has equated it to rocket science, designed for intellectuals, or generally, it is impractical for an average student to comprehend. Additionally, assignments on Shakespeare given in school do not seem to encompass critical reading, thinking, or study skills that give rise to avid readers (Cartmell, p. 20). This cycle continues given the student in the same education system end up as literature professors in institutions of higher learning. With such negative attitudes towards given literal works, negative reading culture is established.

The perception in recent years over a persistent drift towards taking easy and more contemporary literature courses, therefore, cannot be ignored. There is a need to make literary criticism compulsory because it encourages a reading culture that promotes inclusivity and broad-based learning in modern Universities. According to Cartmell (p. 23), some academicians will insist on the use of Shakespeare. As much as the school is mandated to provide such a course, it is important that others are consulted and their misgivings took into account. The opinions of all stakeholders have to be taken into account to ensure acceptance and ownership. Without the participation of both parents and educators, any such course is considered as an imposition that is punitive and does not add value.

Contemporary Literature

Literature education encompasses such a wide variance in terms of different periods, authors, or thematic concerns. According to Callaghan (p. 18), Shakespeare was notably a practical dramatist; both his protagonists and villains are presented, not in entirety but also for amusement purposes. It would be unconventional to present romantic “heroines” in the Elizabethan period without considering Shakespeare’s work (Vicker, p. 99). Many of his protagonists are men and women, who are the pure embodiment of sophistication and intelligence. In his works, women are presented as the fair and tender gender. It begs the question of his attempt to empower women is comedy or well-crafted work to challenge a well-defined male-dominated society that did not allow women even on stage (Bevington and Halio, p. 78).

Modern feminists have challenged the kind of women empowerment that is evident in Shakespearean works. Some of the critics of empowerment as embodied in Shakespearean thinking include; Virginia Wolf or Jane Austen. These writers believe that an empowerment process should be inclusive in view of different generations. Feminists argue that to capture the interests of women across generations, there is a need to include comparative literature in the curriculum (Callaghan, p. 21).

It was an Elizabethan habit to draw literary masterpieces from their immediate environment. This meant that works of literature were not purely a mere creation in the head of the writer or inventions of their own. Moreover, the works tended to have central themes and did not include too many unnecessary scenes. According to thinkers, learning Shakespeare can be enjoyed if readers see the sense of the plot without necessarily being tied to the language. Aer (p. 29) notes that curriculum change in literature is necessary to ensure literal truths from different writers and epochs are appreciated.

Some academicians insist on using Shakespeare. This seems to be uncoordinated with reality according to many parents. Parents contend that their children cannot understand why Shakespearean literature is being imposed on them whereas other simple literary works exist. While it is appreciated that schools have the mandate when it comes to which course units to offer, decisions should be made in a consultative way to avoid unnecessary issues. Participatory approaches to decision-making enhance ownership of decisions and parents appreciate why the school adopts given policies or courses of action.


Literary works tend to reflect the time and period when they were written. Many contemporary people grew up reading Mills and Boon and Nancy Drew books and thus insist that a shift to Shakespeare is an uphill task. According to Lupton (1997), educators have to facilitate this transition with many deliberations and ensure both student and parents’ active participation because their reading culture at home tends to be reflected in their academics. This change is possible if universities include other unexplored writers in the syllabus rather than repeating pedantic materials considered too narrow in perspective (Aers, p. 61). Modern writers such as; Joyce and Wool (1882-1941, D. H Lawrence (1885-1930), George Orwell (1903- 50), and William Golding (1911 – 93) present their literary works in a simple yet integrating manner (Aer, p. 98). Hence, the appeal of their literary works across institutions of higher learning is contributing to fading away of Shakespeare. Learning aesthetics and literary criticism help a student to develop a taste of art and personality who is open and flexible, which helps towards making better literary critics.

Other aspects have to be considered in studying literature, including authors, relevance, and form of literary writing. Literature being diverse, it is a gross mistake to generalize as to say that all Shakespeare writings are difficult or boring just like not all contemporary writings are simple. To make students’ excursion into literature complete, there is a need to be inclusive and understand other writings besides Shakespeare (Marchette, p. 56). This is the most critical reason why Shakespeare is no longer a compulsory course in schools while literary criticism on the other hand is a compulsory course.


The modern English language is used widely to enhance understanding of rhythm and expression of original works of art. The language has achieved this without major distortions. Vicker (p. 16) argues that Shakespeare’s work uses archaic language. The kind of language Shakespeare uses is deliberate and is a common poetic device widely used during his era. Presently, its relevance in conceptualizing his content is largely criticized. According to (Bevington and Halio, p. 70), the evolution of language and patterns of conveying ideas should be considered. Modern literary works are programmed in line with the ever-evolving modern English. Therefore, the point of inflicting Middle English is a question many critics continue to ask. The interaction with other languages is an aspect, which influences or leads to the change of another language. Linguists suggest that for communication to occur, vocabulary and grammar play a major role. In his expression of real issues like love and challenges like grief or betrayal, Shakespeare employees are given vocabulary. For example, in Romeo and Juliet, the need to change to understand prejudices and biases in society is exposed.

In Macbeth, vocabulary and style help build that message that as much as ambition is good, it can be destructive. These are very relevant issues today but the language to convey this is complex. In the process of reading and comprehension, the reader is lost in syntax (Davidson, p. 17). It is only if there is understanding that students are able to sharpen their analytical skills. This representation of Literature evolution cannot be limited; instead, the opportunity to link concepts is crucial to express traditional and classical literature to more contemporary writing in relevance and interpretation (Marchette, p. 32). This awakening was canonized in the ’90s with many ideologies. For example, to purport feminist ideals, a female writer like Nancy Drew, gives one perspective on Shakespeare’s contribution to historical fiction. Some critics argue that his usage of the word ‘whole’ in his writings is an implication of the place of women in Shakespeare’s world (Callaghan, p. 31).

Each writer influences the development of different literary genres. Across history, the different authors have contributed significantly to the development of given literature i.e. African-American, Russian or American. For example, Equiano or Baldwin helped to shape slaves’ narratives. Most slave narratives are their cultural history writing with literary intent. Studying renowned Russian writers like Leo Tolstoy whose writings serve to explore human psychology in expressing beliefs and philosophies on their political and social issues can be very informative (Callaghan, p. 44).


Technology can be useful in comprehension, analysis, understanding, and appreciating Shakespearean writing. Reading a book compared to watching a movie or using the internet to research is more time-consuming. Besides, interactive technology through multimedia systems makes it enjoyable and enhances participation. Literary devices have embraced the technology of late. Besides, internet technology has simplified how literary work is consumed (Burton, p. 39). By modern technology, such as the internet, the modern author and students can interact freely, hence making it easier for them to understand the literary work in context. This is unlike Shakespeare’s era, where interaction was only limited to the literal work itself. According to Burton (101), it takes a shorter time for an author to come up with his or her works. Thus, when tackling academic work, taking a piece of literary work in the form it was originally intended in the first instance is a key in comprehending and appreciating how the author uses fiction to bring art to life (Bevington and Halio, p. 83).

Social media is designed to appeal to a certain section of the population that is comprised of young people. They have been made to believe that reading is tedious compared to sitting down and watching a movie-like Romeo and Juliet that lasts an hour or so than taking the book itself. According to Burton (p. 26), Social Media are available freely or on subscription online and grant an opportunity in utilizing modern pieces of literature. Therefore, it is difficult particularly for younger generations to uphold the conventional reading culture.


Literature is the best criticism of life and Shakespeare plays a central role in the heritage of literature. However, it is important to realize the contributions made by many others like the classic Russian, Latin American, or black writers and contemporary writers.

Curriculum change has been influenced by several factors, including relevance to the contemporary world, perception, technology, and the need to appreciate other literary works in creating an inclusive system of education. Therefore, literature classes meant to make a holistic literature student have to draw substantially from all aspects of life.

This will contribute to a greater understanding of literary works and their influence. Besides, the growth of technology has prompted and increased ways of reading culture among students. Students can easily access updated literary books online and interact with the authors directly. This is unlike the past, where students had to access physical literal material. When this perspective is embraced, it likely is not only Shakespeare’s works that are fading but also the works of other old distinguishable authors are fading.

Works Cited

  1. Aers, Lesley. Shakespeare in the Changing Curriculum, Routledge, New York, 1991
  2. Bevington, M David and Halio, L Halio. Shakespeare, Pattern of Excelling Nature: Shakespeare Criticism in Honor of America’s Bicentennial: From the International Shakespeare Association Congress, University of Delaware Press. Washington, D.C, 1978
  3. Burton Paul. Information Technology and Society: Implications for the Information Professions, Library Association Publishing, London, 1992
  4. Callaghan, Dymphna. A Feminist Companion to Shakespeare: Black Companions to Literature and Culture, Wiley-Blackwell, New York, 2001
  5. Cartmell, Deborah. Interpreting Shakespeare on screen. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2002
  6. Lupton. Thinking with Shakespeare: Essay on politics and life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2010
  7. Marchette, Gaylord Chute. (1956) Stories from Shakespeare, World Publishing Company, New York, 1956
  8. Vicker, Brian. William Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. New York. Routledge, New York, 1996