One distinct group is the utilitarians, who find that distributive justice under the difference principle is disappointing on the grounds that a massive consequence in total welfare may have to be compensated to bring into being a comparatively small benefit for the worst off. Utilitarianism believes in the maximization of entire welfare, which is an utmost benefit for the maximum number of individuals. The difference principle believes it unfair if a larger numeral benefits an immense deal even if the least privileged are made worse off only by a moderately minute margin. In the eyes of the utilitarian, on the other hand, this should be acknowledged; it is a competent and just distribution.
Libertarians believe that each individual should have an identical right to basic liberties, and that main beliefs that preside over the distribution of resources are looking on the wrong track. As an alternative, the distribution of wealth and income should be an effect of self-directed choices made by individuals. Whether the ending is an equal distribution or gigantic inequalities, the significant point is that the dealings or transfers of the wealth are by themselves justified. All should have the liberty to build up capital or misuse wealth, and the resulting disparity in resources should be still considered just because it stems from voluntary dealings.
This theory will facilitate overcoming the problems as it will ensure that while giving benefit to the maximum number of people according to utilitarians under distributive justice but on the same hand accommodate an individual for the hard work one has done in the past.