Human rights are legally enshrined principles by which people’s rights are judged in different countries and at other times. The history of this document is ancient. Back in the 13th century, the first analogs appeared, which are now considered to be ancient documents with fixed rights and freedoms (Angelo and Bocci 2021). Since then, much has changed, both socially and politically. The most striking example can be considered the tactics of warfare, which differ significantly from the time of writing the first documents, which recorded the use of one or another weapon.
The document has more of a sociological influence than a military or political one. For the most part, this document is a statement of the basic principles of how people should live in order to achieve total harmony and peace for all around them. As practice shows, it is difficult to call this kind of agreement influential because, for centuries, there has been a systematic record of violations of the provisions of this set of rules in the world. This is exemplified by the many wars that are still going on today, where human rights are not as necessary as the expansion and conquest of new territories.
In this regard, it was necessary to create a set of rules not only for society but also for the political sphere, where such decisions would be discussed and criticized by the international community (Barghouti 2022). Most Human Rights are still observed today. Still, if we look at the situation in other countries with censorship and political persecution, it is difficult to call this document fully valid. Despite the development of human rights since World War II, which showed how inhumane problems could be without the intervention of the relevant authorities, such a system still needs refinement in various areas, such as the fight against poverty and the weak economies of other countries. Therefore, more attention should be paid to this issue in the future, either by creating an improved version of the document or by establishing supervisory bodies.
Terrorism can be considered one of the most horrible crimes in the history of humankind. It is a demonstration of how a small number of fanatics of one ideology can take the lives of many other innocent people. Global terrorism can be considered the most dangerous since it does not involve one particular state but all at once, which increases the number of potential victims several times over. There are several reasons why every terrorist group that has openly talked about war with the United States. The most important can be considered America’s foreign policy, which directly affects states with many terrorists (Giles Fraser 2015). These people are determined to defend their country at all costs. Moreover, the war on terror left a devastating effect on the Middle Eastern countries, killing tens of hundreds of civilians (Tisdall 2021). In addition, according to religious beliefs, the methods used by these criminals are justified by their religion. Such a solution only exacerbates the problem, as it generates even more followers of the radical approach to solving the problem.
In order to solve this kind of problem, a number of rules need to be followed that will severely limit the activities of these groups. They could be more thorough checks of citizens from countries in which terrorist organizations are openly declared, accompaniment in other countries with guides that can keep the public safe, as well as the political arena, where the fight against radicalized people can rally several states. However, it is impossible to eradicate terrorism. Since this radical current is at the core of many conditions, fanatics will try to carry out actions related to undermining the security of other countries with increasing frequency (Giles Fraser 2015). This could be an essential obstacle to the eradication of terrorist organizations around the world. Thus, despite the government in a particular country, it cannot regulate society within if it is radicalized toward other states, such as the United States.
Bibliography
Angelo, Paul J., and Dominic Bocci. 2021. “The Changing Landscape of Global LGBTQ+ Rights.” Council on Foreign Relations. Web.
Barghouti, Mariam. 2022. “Another Group Recognized Israel’s Palestinian Apartheid. How Will the World React?” Web.
Giles Fraser. 2015. “It’s Not the Religion That Creates Terrorists, It’s the Politics | Giles Fraser: Loose Canon.” The Guardian. The Guardian. Web.
Tisdall, Simon. 2021. “Lives Lost, Poverty, an Arms Race, Rights Destroyed … the Continuing Cost of 9/11.” The Guardian. Web.