Human Rights: Domestic vs. International Institutions

Subject: Law
Pages: 2
Words: 293
Reading time:
< 1 min

The importance of human rights protection for contemporary society preconditioned the emergence of multiple mechanisms to monitor the situation and assist people in their struggle. There are both domestic institutions and international tribunals that are expected to work with cases of this sort and solve the emerging issues. The effectiveness of such establishments grows as there is also a tendency towards the emergence of new regulations and guidelines on how to consider human rights infringements. In many cases, international tribunals become a certain kind of the court of the last resort that can work with complex cases disregarded at the domestic levels because of the peculiarities of legislation. Decisions of these treaty bodies significantly impact the interpretation of human rights by explaining the current situation and showing the need to protect human dignity and freedoms.

To improve the situation, it is a critical need for the introduction of economic sanctions to put pressure on states where violations have systemic character and are disregarded by domestic legal institutions. It will apparently become a potent tool that will guarantee that human rights issues will be considered a serious question that should be given significant attention. The most complex cases can presuppose the International Criminal Court’s involvement as the body that might provide hard punishments for the worst offenders or repeat violators and enforce the global standards by applying appropriate and severe limits. This powerful international institution, along with the UN, can offer the greatest likelihood of success by addressing serious violations and providing assistance to victims if they need it. Acting within the existing global human rights framework, they can attain significant success in improving the lives of populations and ensuring individuals’ ability to enjoy all available freedoms.