Addressing the idea of living without fears as the only path that a Christian can take in their spiritual growth, one will also recognize the need to carve the script of the sermon in a way that indicates the direction for the future development of the audience. The text in question indicates that the view of the normal world represents the setting where people have no fear of reconciling with their beliefs and spirituality. Moreover, the author incorporates an underlying message that the specified lack of fear provides the basis for the further enhancement of community ties between Christian believers.
However, there might be a hint of trouble in the text at hand. By driving a very distinct and coarse line between the right side of the argument and the wrong one, the author of the text may imply that the opposing side may have little to no redeeming value left. As a result, the text tends to distance the Christian community from others, creating a sense of isolation and the idea of being estranged from those that do not share Christian beliefs and ideas.
Therefore, a compromise might be needed to maintain the possibility of reconnecting with those that may have only started their path toward embracing Christian ideas or are ready to accept new viewpoints. In the described situation, help comes from the idea that one needs to incorporate an emotional approach to understanding the nature of conflicts between Christians and non-Christian members of the global community. Namely, by focusing on incorporating the principles of empathy and patience into the discussion of relevant ideas with those holding opposing views, a Christian leader can convince the interloper to accept Christian values, thus gradually converting one to Christianity.
Moreover, with the refusal to confine the Christian narrative to the set of rigid ideas while retaining foundational faith, a Christian leader will be able to build stronger ties across different communities, expanding the philosophy of Christianity. Overall, the world appears to have changed significantly as the notions of tolerance, acceptance, and a reasonable dialogue were introduced into it. Moreover, a deeper understanding of an individual’s emotional experiences, which has been promoted recently on the global scale, has helped to shape the argument toward a calmer discussion. Delving into the nature of the problem and exploring theirs and one another’s emotions, people, have managed to embrace the idea of acceptance while retaining their core beliefs.